- This topic has 34 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Honestly could have fooled me as most your post come off as extremely aggressive, now it’s just overly rude and aggressive. There’s absolutely no reason to continually insult someone. Stating one thing incorrectly does not discredit the whole. Intelligence is not necessarily correlated to being well thought out, so now you’re putting words in my mouth. I have no desire to argue philosophy or to argue with someone who feels they’re right no matter what as it’s just draining to me, but to answer your question, no I don’t see it. The concept of being manly is largely foreign to me and generally speaking I don’t view music that way.
The question now is: do you also see it?
No, I don’t.
Surely only a mind such as Nietzsche’s could possibly grasp Alek’s music is about,
if only he had been born into the 20th century.
In all likelihood, who else but heirs to his philosophy can point out this to us?OK, done with the sarcastic vernacular.
Notwithstanding your quarrel against an imaginary critic that doesn’t like rave music and considering it as ‘non-music’
and your obvious love of Alek’s music and Nietzsche’s philosophy, you should rein in your arrogance and condescension real quick.If you can’t understand what Sherkel was trying to say, instead of going full nuclear on him and ad homineming, perhaps you could try to formulate
a clearer summary of what he meant, and confirm that with him.
But judging from your posts, you made no genuine and constructive attempt, nor efforts to understand Sherkel’s reasoning,
and dismissed it as immature babbling.So you are fine excusing yourself on how aggressively you express your thoughts on the basis of intersubjectivity and relativism digressions (
I want to believe we are responsible adults that know what opinions are, and do not feel the need to reexplain it every single time you are met
with disagreement), but you can grok Nietzsche and dismiss Sherkel because he is too illegible to your tastes?
You can accuse me of reacting to tone, and say “You don’t like it? Too bad, I am not going to change it!”I can only give you advice, and that’s all I am going to do.
This is not the first time regulars are being rustled by your abrasiveness.
From your track record in the TYFTH forum and that infected mushroom forum, you better start checking yourself before you wreck yourself.
If you can’t be bothered with etiquette and courtesy on the forum (like in real life), and dismiss it as moral of the weak, if only you agree with yourself,
yet no one else here does, then why are you still here?
Surely another Internet place sharing your views would be more suitable for you.
It’s fine if you want to stay too. But don’t expect me to keep up with your highbrow, tough guy front.
Intelligence is not necessarily correlated to being well thought out, so now you’re putting words in my mouth.
>_>
It’s fine if you want to stay too.
Nah, you’re right. I pretty much self-ostracized myself with my reckless behaviour. I’m leaving. But before I do that, I’ll bestow on my fellow horsers one more community review:
Infected Mushroom — Chenchen Barvaz
Track of the year for me. Only wish the final climax at 6:44 persisted a little longer, or that it returned for another loop. It’s a simultaneously funny and serious track. Awesome.
5/5
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.